Friday, October 24, 2008
Chomsky, Zinn, and Obama
Another Election Day approaches and I’m reminded of something the late Pakistani dissident, Eqbal Ahmad said about Noam Chomsky in the book, Confronting Empire (2000): “He (Chomsky) has never wavered. He has never fallen into the trap of saying, ‘Clinton will do better.’ Or ‘Nixon was bad but Carter at least had a human rights presidency.’ There is a consistency of substance, of posture, of outlook in his work.”
But along came 2004…when Chomsky said stuff like this: “Anyone who says ‘I don’t care if Bush gets elected’ is basically telling poor and working people in the country, ‘I don’t care if your lives are destroyed’.” And like this: “Despite the limited differences [between Bush and Kerry] both domestically and internationally, there are differences. In a system of immense power, small differences can translate into large outcomes.”
Standing alongside Chomsky was Howard Zinn, saying stuff like this: “Kerry, if he will stop being cautious, can create an excitement that will carry him into the White House and, more important, change the course of the nation.”
Fast forward to 2008 and Chomsky sez: “I would suggest voting against McCain, which means voting for Obama without illusions.” And once again, Howard Zinn is in agreement: “Even though Obama does not represent any fundamental change, he creates an opening for a possibility of change.” (Two word rejoinder: Bill Clinton)
And yes, I posted it at Daily Kos
+++
+++
Event Alert:
The folks at Bluestockings Bookstore have penciled me in on:
Saturday, November 15 @ 7:00 pm
Mickey Z. Does Stand-Up Tragedy
I hope you’ll join us, bring friends, and spread the word far and wide.
FREE
+++
Mickey Z. on YouTube:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Click here to hear me interviewed on Break for News
+++
Order my brand new book, No Innocent Bystanders, here
Order my new novel, CPR for Dummies, here
Like what you see on this blog? Then please make a donation
Share